Californians for Affordable and Reliable Energy’s Statement on Environmental Defense Fund Policy Paper
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 17, 2013
The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) recently released a critique of Navigant Consulting’s whitepaper, “Preliminary Assessment of Regulatory Cost Drivers in California’s Energy Market.” The CARE Coalition (Californians for Affordable and Reliable Energy) agrees with EDF’s assessment that the Legislature and state agencies must carefully examine the benefits and costs of our state’s energy programs. But CARE would assert there is a void of information regarding the extent of state program impacts, and we believe that additional information is crucial in order for California legislators and regulators to adequately consider implementation of current programs and adoption of any new energy related mandates.
The CARE Coalition is focused on educating Californians about the energy challenges ahead as they relate to protecting an affordable and reliable supply of fuels and electricity. The California Department of Finance recently reported that unemployment increased for the second month in a row to a level of 8.9%, widening the gap with the U.S. unemployment rate of 7.3%. While unemployment is increasing around the state, communities are seeing the direct impacts of the state’s troubling business climate. The CARE Coalition believes that a full investigation of the state’s energy programs is necessary to understand the relationship between job creation and economic growth and rising energy costs.
Another aspect of energy policy that deserves careful examination is to assess the cumulative impact of the broad range of regulatory programs currently being implemented. The groundbreaking nature of many of these programs provides a compelling reason to not only assess the impact of a particular program, but more importantly, determine the impact of all the programs collectively to California consumers and economy.
The Navigant whitepaper encouraged more analysis and an understanding of existing state policies. We highly recommend the Legislature and state agencies offer more clarity on the obligations of California ratepayers and taxpayers as existing programs are implemented in the coming months and years. Members of the CARE coalition believe there will be significant impacts on California energy users that cannot be avoided without a coherent, comprehensive strategy that organizes and prioritizes energy actions ahead.
“Californians know that the state is an environmental leader on climate change policies. What they don’t know is the associated costs that these policies have on our economy. Navigant Consulting’s whitepaper was built on the foundation from the recent Little Hoover Commission report that clearly identified cost impacts and potential unintended consequences. These are the facts state policymakers need in order to design a comprehensive energy policy that is consistent with the Governor’s desire to encourage business investment and create jobs,” said Rob Lapsley, President, California Business Roundtable.
As a part of our mission to educate, CARE contracted with Navigant Consulting to provide information regarding cost and reliability impacts on consumers as a result of energy policies and mandates. Navigant and its legacy companies have worked on energy market issues for over 30 years, and in all aspects of the utility planning, operations, and legislative and regulatory compliance, providing Navigant with a comprehensive understanding of the interplay of key market issues and drivers that impact the energy industry.
Navigant’s whitepaper warns policymakers and stakeholders that “The cumulative effect on energy costs (electricity and transportation fuels) is only beginning to be understood by those most affected, which speaks to the need for a more informed dialogue.” CARE believes this dialogue is worth having if we truly care about protecting business investment and job creation in the state. Energy costs and certainty are a major factor for businesses of all sizes that should not be underestimated in the state’s energy planning process.
The Navigant whitepaper clearly articulates that it is examining the costs and is not a cost/benefit evaluation of recently passed policies and regulations. It makes clear that the purpose was not to examine already well-documented environmental and related benefits that have been outlined in other studies. Instead the whitepaper calls for a more detailed and comprehensive review of the cumulative impacts of a much larger list of policies and regulations than just the three examples examined in the whitepaper.
At the time of publishing, the whitepaper was the first of its kind in that it pooled together recognized data on energy costs and impacts throughout California. Navigant’s assertions relied primarily on previous public reports, studies and statements by California and Federal regulatory bodies for its references including: the California Energy Commission, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Air Resources Board, the California Independent System Operator, and the Energy Information Administration among others.
As cost increases are appearing in communities across the state for both fuel and electricity bills, consumers and business groups are asking questions about this trend and wondering what they are facing down the road. We hope the state takes these questions seriously and begins a process to evaluate energy policy impacts and provide more informative analysis regarding what businesses and consumers should expect as a result of California’s energy programs.